freeThinkBham

Take a moment and ponder the last century of human history and you will hardly get five minutes into it without being completely overwhelmed by the achievements we have made as a species. Just think of how far we have come in the last one hundred years. Automobiles, aviation, relativity theory, wireless transmission, vacuum tubes, antibiotics, vaccines, space flight, microchips, computers, the internet, cell phones, bone marrow harvesting, respirators, microwaves, satellites, digital cameras, birth control, ipods, films, GPS devices, etc. In the last one hundred years we have doubled the life expectancy of a human being, significantly increased the infant morality rate, set a historical precedent for free enterprise, and fundamentally eroded equality barriers for women and black people. This is truly remarkable and I am proud to be alive and thriving in such a wonderful age of technological and social advancement.

Lest we congratulate ourselves too much it’s also important to thoughtfully consider and criticize the ways that we are stunted and morally retarded. It is amazing to me that in the age of reason we still haven’t made up our minds in our social discourse over whether or not homosexuals should have equal rights. Let’s consider some facts and some opinions.

Although the American Psychological Association makes it clear that the longstanding consensus of the behavioral and social sciences and the health and mental professions is that homosexuality is a normal and positive variation of human sexual orientation, some people still seem to think that it is a mental disorder. Although homosexuality can be observed in nature (lions, pigeons, giraffes, bison, elephants, gulls, bonobos, dragonflies, sheep, dolphin, just to name a few) some people still consider it a dysfunctional CHOICE. Although study after study shows that there is an equal level of commitment and relationship satisfaction amongst both gay and heterosexual couples, some people still think that homosexuals are incapable of having healthy and lasting relationships. Although studies show that children raised by same-sex couples are just as mentally healthy as other children, some people still think that homosexuals are not fit parents. Although studies show no correlation between homosexuality and child molestation, some people still consider homosexuals a threat and a danger to children.

Are we seeing a pattern of bigotry here, folks? Two years ago in the California state elections Proposition 8, a constitutional amendment seeking to restrict the definition of marriage to opposite-sex couples, actually PASSED effectively retarding the social progress of basic human rights to everyone that was ALREADY IN PLACE. In re Marriage Cases (passed in May 2008) held that “California legislative and initiative measures limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples violate the state constitutional rights of same-sex couples and may not be used to preclude same-sex couples from marrying.” This is a travesty and a huge setback for moral progress.

The National Organization for Marriage (NOM) is a non profit organization that seeks to prevent the legal recognition and acceptance of same-sex marriage. Their stated mission is to, “protect marriage and the faith communities that sustain it.” Maggie Gallagher, the group’s founder and original president, has stated that the LGBT community and specifically gay men are not capable of commiting to the “heteronormative” constraints of a monogamous relationship. Her bigotry is exposed when the above survey data indicates that between 40% – 60% of gay men are in romantic relationships and 18% – 28% of gay couples have lived together for over ten years.

NOM recently posted this video on youtube. It’s from a marriage rally in Albany, NY on July 17, 2010. This video claims that gay marriage protestors “bullied and intimidated” the mother and her kids at a peaceful marriage rally. Watch the video and then let’s talk for a minute about reality and false victimization.

Mother and Children Bullied

1. So, let me get this straight. Protestors simply stood silently in front of this woman and her family with rainbow colored flags and signs “about their agenda.” They participated in non-violent, perfectly constitutional protest. This is bullying and intimidation? Of course the cops were called. But after speaking briefly with the organizer of the pro-gay marriage protest they let them stay. Why? Because they have every fucking right to. You cannot call someone a bully for disagreeing with your bigotry. Got it?

2. Using her children in a ploy for false victimization is disgusting. Her kids have no idea why they are there and will, unfortunately, have to be TAUGHT to dehumanize gay people by their mother and her ilk.

3. She then asked the protestors to turn around so she could publically expose her breasts. When some of them refused she actually believed that this made her a victim. She goes into the public square and demands that everyone else give her privacy so she can expose herself? Stellar logic.

4. She claims that their goal was to intimidate her children. This is false. The goal was to consitutionally protest a meeting that propogates bigotry and the subversion of basic human rights. It’s funny because when I think about intimidation and bullying I tend to think about, oh I don’t know, the bible saying that homosexuals should be stoned to death. Maybe we just have subjective differences in our definition of bullying. I wonder if Carl Joseph Walker-Hoover, the eleven year old boy who hung himself last year because of anti-gay harrassment, would agree that standing quietly with rainbow umbrellas rises to the same level of intimidation as what led him to his death.

5. Here is the most frustrating thing for me. This woman is at a NOM rally which is all about protecting what? Oh, that’s right. Traditional marriage and family values. I’m no expert on nationality but it seems pretty clear to me that this woman has latino heritage. Two of her children look black and her husband is literally as white as they come. This is hardly a traditional family, wouldn’t you say? I mean. Go back just FIFTY YEARS and consider the implication of interracial marriage and interracial children. Just think about that for a second. By dehumanizing homosexuals this woman is putting herself at odds with the very progress of human rights and dignity that allow her the freedom to have her obviously untraditional family.

This is not progress. We are moving backwards on this issue. We cannot allow people like this one to create a culture of false victimization. This is not an isolated issue. Perry vs. Schwarzenegger, the federal court challenge to Proposition 8, implemented a block broadcast of the trial. Why? Because the publicity could potentially lead to the harrassment of proponents of Proposition 8 by those who don’t agree with them. Michael Hefflinger sarcastically notes:

Because, let’s face it: the straight folks who worked so hard and gave so much money to see Prop. 8 passed — and not gay and lesbian Californians — were the real victims during the campaign. It’s the straights who have suffered greatly since Prop. 8’s passage, and they are the ones who should be spared any further grief.

We can stop this madness. Bigotry will not survive in the marketplace of ideas, friends. Here’s to standing together for human dignity and the freedom and pursuit of happiness for all human beings.

In reason,

Clint Wells

Clint Wells Events, Living, Politics bigotry, homosexuality, NOM, Politics, religion

According to a recent article at CNN.com, Louisiana lawmakers are proposing a day of prayer to stop the oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico. State Senator Robert Adley had this to say:

“Thus far efforts made by mortals to try to solve the crisis have been to no avail. It is clearly time for a miracle for us.”

It is a testament to our great infancy as an intelligent species that in the era of modern science, the age of reason and enlightenment, state senators and even President Obama (for crying out loud) actually consider speaking to an invisible deity a reasonable solution for this horrendous calamity. Perhaps these politicians are simply appealing to the American majority of evangelical Christians and do not, in fact, consider prayer a reasonable course of action. No matter. The fact that they have to appeal to such nonsense to secure their offices by a majority democratic vote is enough reason to be alarmed.

In my essay Prayer, Science and Haiti I made a strong case, using observed evidence, for the utter ineffectiveness of prayer. I won’t elaborate any further on that as it is scientifically uncontested. Look it up yourself.

This is what really pisses me off about praying for the oil spill: While the pious are kneeling before an imaginary god wishing for a miracle, someone is working around the clock to actually solve the problem. When they do solve the problem it will be because of the ingenuity of that person (or team of people) and it will be implemented using tools and methods derived solely from science. But what will the religious community say? They will shout to the heavens about how GOD answered their prayers! They’ll talk about the futile efforts of man and how good GOD is to have heard their fledgling petitions. They will completely ignore the fact that GOD could have easily prevented the oil spill in the first place or plugged the hole with a divine horde of angels, thereby saving the lives of countless animals and protecting America from another devastating economic blow.

And here is the truly remarkable thing. What will the religious community say if the day of prayer does not have any effect on the oil spill whatsoever (as observable reality suggests)? Well, of course they will say that GOD’s will is mysterious and that it is probably for the good of our national character, even though our minds are too puny to comprehend it. They might say it’s the work of the devil in the eternal battle for good and evil. More likely, they will blame it on the gays, blacks, Jews, democrats or really any demographic they do not belong to. One thing they will certainly not do, my friends, is reflect on whether or not it was a complete waste of time. They certainly will not wonder if GOD really exists or not.

Why should they? After all everyone has at least one story of baffling circumstantial coincidence. Maybe you were about to file bankruptcy and a relative died leaving you an inheritance. Maybe you struck out every time you were up to bat except for the one time the bases were loaded. Maybe you survived a car crash without a scratch. Maybe your relative’s cancer went into remission. And so on and so forth. I’ve had moments like these. We all have.

But if we’re really honest we’ve had A LOT more moments when these things did not pan out. We’ve prayed for LOTS of things that never happened. After all, every basketball game ends confirming the prayers of one side and ignoring the prayers of the other, right? The progressive believer may say that God does not care about sporting events. Fair enough. But what about when children die of cancer? What about when families are torn apart by substance abuse? What about the Holocaust? No, the perceived answer to prayers are commonly things that would have happened naturally either way (thus compatible with laws of probability) or are results of scientific innovation (antibiotics, surgery, genetic engineering, etc.).

This is called confirmation bias or, counting the hits and ignoring the misses. Consider the incredibly ironic story of a recent lightning bolt destroying the Touchdown Jesus statue in Monroe, Ohio. Now if a lightning bolt had struck the Hustler adult store across the street from Touchdown Jesus these people would have no doubt considered that an act of GOD. A fiery judgment on fornication. But since the lighting hit Jesus square in the face they are appealing to science, blaming the sporadic nature of lightning and the metal frame that Touchdown Jesus housed under his buttery exterior. Interestingly none of them consider the lightning a judgment from Zeus, the once widely worshiped thunder god.

It may be clear to Senator Adley that we need a prayer miracle in the gulf. But it’s clear to me and any reasonable person that sitting around and talking to yourself is exactly what we DO NOT need. We need real people devising real solutions to a real problem. People think I’m angry? Well, when it comes to this issue, if you’re not angry then you’re not paying attention.

In Reason,

Clint Wells

Clint Wells Events, Living, Politics Gulf Coast, Oil Spill, Prayer, Science, Touchdown Jesus

It’s that time again, folks : the political primaries will be coming to you on June 1, 2010. Sadly, we were long ago forced to abandon the idea of simply trusting our politicians, because they often tell us only what they think we want to hear. We have the ultimate responsibility of choosing the candidate we deem to be the most aligned with our personal ideals and values… but based on nothing more than his/her strategically tailored, target-audience-seeking messages. In the great state of Alabama, the hopefuls think that the message we want to hear is one that speaks largely of guns, glory, and gratuitous amounts of nearly-racist sentiment… or so it would seem, judging by some of the intricately wrought political ads seen on the airwaves of late.

Here’s an ad from Tim James, a Republican frontrunner. Apparently, his idea of what a large majority of Alabamians will want is discrimination against anyone who doesn’t speak English as their first language. He claims that not giving driver’s license exams in multiple languages will save the state significant amounts of money. Take a look :

Tim James : English Only

The fact of the matter is that giving driver’s license exams in Farsi, Spanish, or even American Sign Language costs the exact same amount as giving the exams in English. When you pay to take the exam, the electronic kiosk you use is the same no matter which language you speak. The system for the exams was funded by a federal grant, has been in use for years, and came with the translating software pre-installed. (A tip of the hat to leftinalabama.com for putting this information out there.)

It is not immediately obvious what is more disheartening : the fact that people will inevitably listen to this ridiculous idea in blissful ignorance and vote for this man because he claims to speak in the name of “common sense”, or the fact that we still have people in the state of Alabama who genuinely believe this nonsense… because let’s face it, without that demographic, Tim James would not make an ad of this sort. Here’s the true “common sense” : People who regularly speak a language more than they speak English are not sub-par citizens. Exams should be given in languages other than English in order to better serve people whose first language is not English.

Here’s another ad, this time from conservative Bradley Byrne. Not once in this ad does the man address anything that is relevant in politics.

No offense to the religious fundies out there, but the idea that a candidate knows he is “a creature of a creator” does not say much in terms of what he is going to do for our state. It does not, in fact, bode well at all, especially when that line of thinking has notoriously been linked with anti-gay and other hateful sentiment that will inevitably condemn certain citizens of our state to an inescapably sub-par demographic.

The fact of the matter is that religion has no place in politics. It seems that no politician can make his or her way into office without giving some sort of flowery adage to the idea that they are receiving their ideas in a direct line from “God”. We need candidate who doesn’t run his campaign on the ideas of gun ownership and church. There are bigger issues at hand.

Equally unfortunate is the fact that, in the current state of politics, the best choice must sometimes be determined not by the greater accumulation of a politician’s relative merits, but in the lesser accumulation of his or her relative evils. The politicians cleverly tailor their ads to that idea as well, attacking each other rather than actually stating what they intend to do for the good of the state and its citizens. The members of both major political parties become aggressive towards each other  rather than staying above the fray and focusing that aggression on the issues, which is what we need as a state. Here’s an attack ad put out by Democratic candidate Artur Davis against his opponent Ron Sparks :

This is singularly ridiculous. Ron Sparks has also put out his own ads counterattacking Artur Davis. Instead of saving the thousands of dollars they spend on these attack ad campaigns and putting that money back into programs which will directly benefit the state, these politicians would rather get involved in televised “he-said, she-said” wars to try to paint their opponents black. The cute thing is, once the primaries are over, one of the attack dogs will immediately change his tune and throw his full support behind the chosen candidate of his party… nevermind anything he said in his attack ads about misappropriation of funds. Apparently, all of that goes away once the party lines are established. Post-primary elections, all that will matter to anyone is whether we have a “conservative” or a “liberal” in office.

What, then,  does it all boil down to? It appears that in these times, it’s all about ignorance and showmanship. Instead of asking us what we want, they tell us what they think we want to hear and never allow us (the general citizenry) to get a word in edgewise. Both political parties are notorious for their power-hungry, prideful, prejudiced and pigheaded ways.

So tell us… what qualities would YOUR ideal candidate for governor have?

_________________________________

PS : For a quick-and-easy list of candidates, see the al.com statewide election index.

Kristin General, Living, Politics

Hey everyone, my name is Andrew, and Progressive Wining is my little sideshow for all you fellow FreeThinkers.

In our Big Red state of Alabama, I’ve heard progressives referred to as “wine-sipping elitists” more than a few times, but all too often people who want to learn more about wine have no clue where to begin their studies, that’s where I come in.

Wine is food, wine is fun, and more often than not, wine is simple. Most people have paired a great Cabernet with an awesome steak plenty of times, but what about pairing a tasty Riesling with a takeout bag full of spicy Rojo, Taj India, or in a pinch at 3AM, Taco Bell. The possibilities are endless!

In the future, I hope to tell you about ways that we can support small wineries, organic farmers, and avoid the big wine conglomerates, but for now, I’m going to start with helping you delve into the local wine scene.

Read more…

akbrim Living Alabama, Birmingham, Wine

Yes, I know… nobody likes that word… “hipster.” But I’m trying to create a guide for people like me and it’s a word that I would find myself wanting to Google if I was new to a town or about to move there. That is why I’m creating this guide. I want people new to the Birmingham area or having to move here (god bless you) to have an easy way of finding out where to hang, drink, meet people, whatever. And let’s face it: “hipster” culture–or whatever name you want to give our slightly alternative lifestyle–isn’t something that’s just on the forefront of Birmingham; you have to dig a little to find it, and trust me: you don’t want to waste your time doing that. I’m hoping that this guide will make it a little easier for people like me to integrate into the Birmingham area. Let’s get started…

Read more…

admin Living alcohol, apartments, bars, Birmingham, booze, Bottletree Cafe, food, groceries, hair stylist, hipster, music, shopping, tattoos, vegan, vegetarian

A few months ago, a billboard was put up on I-20 about 50 miles outside of Birmingham that said “Imagine No Religion.” Well needless to say, a lot of people got upset about it. Here’s a video of some local Christians praising Lamar’s decision not to display the “offensive” billboard.

That’s right, their argument is that the Atheist’s opinion is offensive to the Southern lifestyle. Heaven forbid a minority opinion be expressed in public. The majority shouldn’t have to stand for such dissension, right? Meanwhile, it’s not even Thanksgiving yet and Lamar has a billboard up that says “Jesus is the Reason for the Season” in one of the busiest parts in Downtown. On top of starting tree worship and gift giving, did Jesus also teach Americans how to eat in the new land?

admin Business, Living atheism, Lamar, religion

There are two ways you can help defend women’s rights and health. First, head over to the Planned Parenthood site to sign the petition disapproving of the Stupak amendment to the House health care bill. For those unfamiliar with the Stupak amendment, it’s a “dangerous piece of legislation that would ban abortion from private and public insurance plans for millions of American women.” We need to let the Senate know that we won’t stand for this as part of the Senate’s health care bill.

The second thing you can do is show up at the health clinic on the corner of 10th Ave S. and 17th St. (across from Al’s) at 8am on Saturday morning to assist as a clinic escort or just stand up to the red tapers and other anti-choice fundies that are sure to be out there in full force. The potential clients of the clinic shouldn’t have to be harassed to exercise their civil liberties. Show up to help support and defend these women!

admin Living abortion, activism, civil rights, pro-choice

The Huffington Post published a great article about the recent case, 1568 Montgomery Hwy v. City of Hoover, aka Love Stuff v. Birmingham Prude Society, that upheld the ban on vibrators and dildos. It brings up a lot of good points and questions about religion bullying its way into the freedoms of individuals.

Here’s an excerpt.

So, what is it about the use of a vibrator or a dildo that affronts the “public morality”? Why is a person who uses such a device “immoral”? The answer, I submit, turns entirely on religion. The pivotal shift from the world of the classical Greeks to our contemporary world, in this respect, was the advent of Christianity, with its emphasis on sexual pleasure as sinful.
…
Of course, people have a right to believe whatever their religion commands. If they wish not to use a sex aid, or to be celibate, that’s their own business. But can this set of beliefs serve as a constitutionally permissible definition of the “public morality” in a nation dedicated to the separation of church and state?

Read the whole article here.

admin Living Love Stuff, religion, sex toys

On Saturday, I saw protestors in front of the New Woman All Women Health Care Clinic. These weren’t the kind of protestors that show big pictures of bloody blobs of cells, these were the kind that put red tape over their mouths that say “LIFE” and they just stand there and pray. I understand that these people aren’t necessarily right-denying bigots, they just happen to think life starts at conception (but not your birthday, I guess). However, I believe that–on top of being a little self-glorifying and well, annoying–as a protest, this style is very ineffective and is actually wasting the time of the protestors.

A good protest would portray a threat of power to actually change the system. These red tape prayers are not doing anything that could actually change the system that allows abortions to happen. They definitely aren’t offering an alternative to what to do with all unintended/unwanted pregnancies (Are they planning a magical giant orphanage colony in Australia?). I suppose at best, they could cause a little anxiety in people walking into the clinic, but they can’t even do that with efficacy because… well, their mouths are taped! So if they’re not doing anything to actually stop the system of abortion, and they’re not doing much to stop a particular abortion at that clinic, why are they spending their Saturdays with tape on their mouths? Apparently, the whole point of these “protests” is to just get in proximity of something they don’t agree with and pray that God will make it vanish from the earth. This would be like me standing in front of a particular McDonald’s chain with a sign that says “Don’t eat meat” and sending positive energy into the Universe hoping that the national franchise will suddenly stop serving meat. It’s just not going to work.

If the “tapers” truly believe that just prayer will achieve their goals, these people need to get a clue and pray on their own time and start doing something more constructive with their Saturdays. Abortions wouldn’t be needed if everyone had a good supply of birth control; why don’t they spend all afternoon handing out condoms? Oh, or I have another idea: if they’re so concerned with the “lives” of children, why don’t they go care for and help nurture a baby that WAS born, perhaps even an unintended child, who’s living a miserable life because the mother didn’t know how to take care of a baby and had one anyway… you know, the exact scenario that their protests are encouraging.

admin Living abortion, anti-choice, civil rights, LIFE, pro-choice, religion, women's health

UAB News reported about several students who took an overnight trip to a place in Alabama that is set up to replicate poverty stricken parts of the world. The students had to split into families and experience the daily struggles to obtain basic necessities through mock-up scenarios. It seems really cool as a way to get experience before doing any sort of humanitarian work.

Read the whole article.

admin Living activism, UAB