freeThinkBham

Take a moment and ponder the last century of human history and you will hardly get five minutes into it without being completely overwhelmed by the achievements we have made as a species. Just think of how far we have come in the last one hundred years. Automobiles, aviation, relativity theory, wireless transmission, vacuum tubes, antibiotics, vaccines, space flight, microchips, computers, the internet, cell phones, bone marrow harvesting, respirators, microwaves, satellites, digital cameras, birth control, ipods, films, GPS devices, etc. In the last one hundred years we have doubled the life expectancy of a human being, significantly increased the infant morality rate, set a historical precedent for free enterprise, and fundamentally eroded equality barriers for women and black people. This is truly remarkable and I am proud to be alive and thriving in such a wonderful age of technological and social advancement.

Lest we congratulate ourselves too much it’s also important to thoughtfully consider and criticize the ways that we are stunted and morally retarded. It is amazing to me that in the age of reason we still haven’t made up our minds in our social discourse over whether or not homosexuals should have equal rights. Let’s consider some facts and some opinions.

Although the American Psychological Association makes it clear that the longstanding consensus of the behavioral and social sciences and the health and mental professions is that homosexuality is a normal and positive variation of human sexual orientation, some people still seem to think that it is a mental disorder. Although homosexuality can be observed in nature (lions, pigeons, giraffes, bison, elephants, gulls, bonobos, dragonflies, sheep, dolphin, just to name a few) some people still consider it a dysfunctional CHOICE. Although study after study shows that there is an equal level of commitment and relationship satisfaction amongst both gay and heterosexual couples, some people still think that homosexuals are incapable of having healthy and lasting relationships. Although studies show that children raised by same-sex couples are just as mentally healthy as other children, some people still think that homosexuals are not fit parents. Although studies show no correlation between homosexuality and child molestation, some people still consider homosexuals a threat and a danger to children.

Are we seeing a pattern of bigotry here, folks? Two years ago in the California state elections Proposition 8, a constitutional amendment seeking to restrict the definition of marriage to opposite-sex couples, actually PASSED effectively retarding the social progress of basic human rights to everyone that was ALREADY IN PLACE. In re Marriage Cases (passed in May 2008) held that “California legislative and initiative measures limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples violate the state constitutional rights of same-sex couples and may not be used to preclude same-sex couples from marrying.” This is a travesty and a huge setback for moral progress.

The National Organization for Marriage (NOM) is a non profit organization that seeks to prevent the legal recognition and acceptance of same-sex marriage. Their stated mission is to, “protect marriage and the faith communities that sustain it.” Maggie Gallagher, the group’s founder and original president, has stated that the LGBT community and specifically gay men are not capable of commiting to the “heteronormative” constraints of a monogamous relationship. Her bigotry is exposed when the above survey data indicates that between 40% – 60% of gay men are in romantic relationships and 18% – 28% of gay couples have lived together for over ten years.

NOM recently posted this video on youtube. It’s from a marriage rally in Albany, NY on July 17, 2010. This video claims that gay marriage protestors “bullied and intimidated” the mother and her kids at a peaceful marriage rally. Watch the video and then let’s talk for a minute about reality and false victimization.

Mother and Children Bullied

1. So, let me get this straight. Protestors simply stood silently in front of this woman and her family with rainbow colored flags and signs “about their agenda.” They participated in non-violent, perfectly constitutional protest. This is bullying and intimidation? Of course the cops were called. But after speaking briefly with the organizer of the pro-gay marriage protest they let them stay. Why? Because they have every fucking right to. You cannot call someone a bully for disagreeing with your bigotry. Got it?

2. Using her children in a ploy for false victimization is disgusting. Her kids have no idea why they are there and will, unfortunately, have to be TAUGHT to dehumanize gay people by their mother and her ilk.

3. She then asked the protestors to turn around so she could publically expose her breasts. When some of them refused she actually believed that this made her a victim. She goes into the public square and demands that everyone else give her privacy so she can expose herself? Stellar logic.

4. She claims that their goal was to intimidate her children. This is false. The goal was to consitutionally protest a meeting that propogates bigotry and the subversion of basic human rights. It’s funny because when I think about intimidation and bullying I tend to think about, oh I don’t know, the bible saying that homosexuals should be stoned to death. Maybe we just have subjective differences in our definition of bullying. I wonder if Carl Joseph Walker-Hoover, the eleven year old boy who hung himself last year because of anti-gay harrassment, would agree that standing quietly with rainbow umbrellas rises to the same level of intimidation as what led him to his death.

5. Here is the most frustrating thing for me. This woman is at a NOM rally which is all about protecting what? Oh, that’s right. Traditional marriage and family values. I’m no expert on nationality but it seems pretty clear to me that this woman has latino heritage. Two of her children look black and her husband is literally as white as they come. This is hardly a traditional family, wouldn’t you say? I mean. Go back just FIFTY YEARS and consider the implication of interracial marriage and interracial children. Just think about that for a second. By dehumanizing homosexuals this woman is putting herself at odds with the very progress of human rights and dignity that allow her the freedom to have her obviously untraditional family.

This is not progress. We are moving backwards on this issue. We cannot allow people like this one to create a culture of false victimization. This is not an isolated issue. Perry vs. Schwarzenegger, the federal court challenge to Proposition 8, implemented a block broadcast of the trial. Why? Because the publicity could potentially lead to the harrassment of proponents of Proposition 8 by those who don’t agree with them. Michael Hefflinger sarcastically notes:

Because, let’s face it: the straight folks who worked so hard and gave so much money to see Prop. 8 passed — and not gay and lesbian Californians — were the real victims during the campaign. It’s the straights who have suffered greatly since Prop. 8’s passage, and they are the ones who should be spared any further grief.

We can stop this madness. Bigotry will not survive in the marketplace of ideas, friends. Here’s to standing together for human dignity and the freedom and pursuit of happiness for all human beings.

In reason,

Clint Wells

Clint Wells Events, Living, Politics bigotry, homosexuality, NOM, Politics, religion

According to a recent article at CNN.com, Louisiana lawmakers are proposing a day of prayer to stop the oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico. State Senator Robert Adley had this to say:

“Thus far efforts made by mortals to try to solve the crisis have been to no avail. It is clearly time for a miracle for us.”

It is a testament to our great infancy as an intelligent species that in the era of modern science, the age of reason and enlightenment, state senators and even President Obama (for crying out loud) actually consider speaking to an invisible deity a reasonable solution for this horrendous calamity. Perhaps these politicians are simply appealing to the American majority of evangelical Christians and do not, in fact, consider prayer a reasonable course of action. No matter. The fact that they have to appeal to such nonsense to secure their offices by a majority democratic vote is enough reason to be alarmed.

In my essay Prayer, Science and Haiti I made a strong case, using observed evidence, for the utter ineffectiveness of prayer. I won’t elaborate any further on that as it is scientifically uncontested. Look it up yourself.

This is what really pisses me off about praying for the oil spill: While the pious are kneeling before an imaginary god wishing for a miracle, someone is working around the clock to actually solve the problem. When they do solve the problem it will be because of the ingenuity of that person (or team of people) and it will be implemented using tools and methods derived solely from science. But what will the religious community say? They will shout to the heavens about how GOD answered their prayers! They’ll talk about the futile efforts of man and how good GOD is to have heard their fledgling petitions. They will completely ignore the fact that GOD could have easily prevented the oil spill in the first place or plugged the hole with a divine horde of angels, thereby saving the lives of countless animals and protecting America from another devastating economic blow.

And here is the truly remarkable thing. What will the religious community say if the day of prayer does not have any effect on the oil spill whatsoever (as observable reality suggests)? Well, of course they will say that GOD’s will is mysterious and that it is probably for the good of our national character, even though our minds are too puny to comprehend it. They might say it’s the work of the devil in the eternal battle for good and evil. More likely, they will blame it on the gays, blacks, Jews, democrats or really any demographic they do not belong to. One thing they will certainly not do, my friends, is reflect on whether or not it was a complete waste of time. They certainly will not wonder if GOD really exists or not.

Why should they? After all everyone has at least one story of baffling circumstantial coincidence. Maybe you were about to file bankruptcy and a relative died leaving you an inheritance. Maybe you struck out every time you were up to bat except for the one time the bases were loaded. Maybe you survived a car crash without a scratch. Maybe your relative’s cancer went into remission. And so on and so forth. I’ve had moments like these. We all have.

But if we’re really honest we’ve had A LOT more moments when these things did not pan out. We’ve prayed for LOTS of things that never happened. After all, every basketball game ends confirming the prayers of one side and ignoring the prayers of the other, right? The progressive believer may say that God does not care about sporting events. Fair enough. But what about when children die of cancer? What about when families are torn apart by substance abuse? What about the Holocaust? No, the perceived answer to prayers are commonly things that would have happened naturally either way (thus compatible with laws of probability) or are results of scientific innovation (antibiotics, surgery, genetic engineering, etc.).

This is called confirmation bias or, counting the hits and ignoring the misses. Consider the incredibly ironic story of a recent lightning bolt destroying the Touchdown Jesus statue in Monroe, Ohio. Now if a lightning bolt had struck the Hustler adult store across the street from Touchdown Jesus these people would have no doubt considered that an act of GOD. A fiery judgment on fornication. But since the lighting hit Jesus square in the face they are appealing to science, blaming the sporadic nature of lightning and the metal frame that Touchdown Jesus housed under his buttery exterior. Interestingly none of them consider the lightning a judgment from Zeus, the once widely worshiped thunder god.

It may be clear to Senator Adley that we need a prayer miracle in the gulf. But it’s clear to me and any reasonable person that sitting around and talking to yourself is exactly what we DO NOT need. We need real people devising real solutions to a real problem. People think I’m angry? Well, when it comes to this issue, if you’re not angry then you’re not paying attention.

In Reason,

Clint Wells

Clint Wells Events, Living, Politics Gulf Coast, Oil Spill, Prayer, Science, Touchdown Jesus

It’s that time again, folks : the political primaries will be coming to you on June 1, 2010. Sadly, we were long ago forced to abandon the idea of simply trusting our politicians, because they often tell us only what they think we want to hear. We have the ultimate responsibility of choosing the candidate we deem to be the most aligned with our personal ideals and values… but based on nothing more than his/her strategically tailored, target-audience-seeking messages. In the great state of Alabama, the hopefuls think that the message we want to hear is one that speaks largely of guns, glory, and gratuitous amounts of nearly-racist sentiment… or so it would seem, judging by some of the intricately wrought political ads seen on the airwaves of late.

Here’s an ad from Tim James, a Republican frontrunner. Apparently, his idea of what a large majority of Alabamians will want is discrimination against anyone who doesn’t speak English as their first language. He claims that not giving driver’s license exams in multiple languages will save the state significant amounts of money. Take a look :

Tim James : English Only

The fact of the matter is that giving driver’s license exams in Farsi, Spanish, or even American Sign Language costs the exact same amount as giving the exams in English. When you pay to take the exam, the electronic kiosk you use is the same no matter which language you speak. The system for the exams was funded by a federal grant, has been in use for years, and came with the translating software pre-installed. (A tip of the hat to leftinalabama.com for putting this information out there.)

It is not immediately obvious what is more disheartening : the fact that people will inevitably listen to this ridiculous idea in blissful ignorance and vote for this man because he claims to speak in the name of “common sense”, or the fact that we still have people in the state of Alabama who genuinely believe this nonsense… because let’s face it, without that demographic, Tim James would not make an ad of this sort. Here’s the true “common sense” : People who regularly speak a language more than they speak English are not sub-par citizens. Exams should be given in languages other than English in order to better serve people whose first language is not English.

Here’s another ad, this time from conservative Bradley Byrne. Not once in this ad does the man address anything that is relevant in politics.

No offense to the religious fundies out there, but the idea that a candidate knows he is “a creature of a creator” does not say much in terms of what he is going to do for our state. It does not, in fact, bode well at all, especially when that line of thinking has notoriously been linked with anti-gay and other hateful sentiment that will inevitably condemn certain citizens of our state to an inescapably sub-par demographic.

The fact of the matter is that religion has no place in politics. It seems that no politician can make his or her way into office without giving some sort of flowery adage to the idea that they are receiving their ideas in a direct line from “God”. We need candidate who doesn’t run his campaign on the ideas of gun ownership and church. There are bigger issues at hand.

Equally unfortunate is the fact that, in the current state of politics, the best choice must sometimes be determined not by the greater accumulation of a politician’s relative merits, but in the lesser accumulation of his or her relative evils. The politicians cleverly tailor their ads to that idea as well, attacking each other rather than actually stating what they intend to do for the good of the state and its citizens. The members of both major political parties become aggressive towards each other  rather than staying above the fray and focusing that aggression on the issues, which is what we need as a state. Here’s an attack ad put out by Democratic candidate Artur Davis against his opponent Ron Sparks :

This is singularly ridiculous. Ron Sparks has also put out his own ads counterattacking Artur Davis. Instead of saving the thousands of dollars they spend on these attack ad campaigns and putting that money back into programs which will directly benefit the state, these politicians would rather get involved in televised “he-said, she-said” wars to try to paint their opponents black. The cute thing is, once the primaries are over, one of the attack dogs will immediately change his tune and throw his full support behind the chosen candidate of his party… nevermind anything he said in his attack ads about misappropriation of funds. Apparently, all of that goes away once the party lines are established. Post-primary elections, all that will matter to anyone is whether we have a “conservative” or a “liberal” in office.

What, then,  does it all boil down to? It appears that in these times, it’s all about ignorance and showmanship. Instead of asking us what we want, they tell us what they think we want to hear and never allow us (the general citizenry) to get a word in edgewise. Both political parties are notorious for their power-hungry, prideful, prejudiced and pigheaded ways.

So tell us… what qualities would YOUR ideal candidate for governor have?

_________________________________

PS : For a quick-and-easy list of candidates, see the al.com statewide election index.

Kristin General, Living, Politics

I’m just kind of going to put this out there: I’m not sure how much of this Langford trial and sentencing is actual justice and how much is typical lynch-mob mentality Southern politics making an example out of someone.

Fact: all politicians are wooed by business people and accept gifts and meals. In Alabama, I think the per-day limit of how much can be spent on a politician is $250. That’s not a limit at all. That’s a shit-ton of money. It seems like, if we wanted to, we could we could create this media frenzy about every politician in the world. All we’d have to do is find a connection between something being given to the politician and some sort of contract or whatever going to the giver. Of course it’s wrong to accept gifts in return for political favors, but that’s how the world works. I pretend like I’m your friend ’cause I buy you clothes or take you to the strip club, and because you, the politician, think that we’re friends, you come to me when the city/county/whatever needs some work done.

The fact that in recent years the only people being called-out on this are a black mayor and a Democrat governor in Alabama kind-of seems a little suspicious to me. Remember how up-in-arms everyone was about Siegelman? Yeah… ooops.

Now, I’m glad Langford isn’t mayor because he just wasn’t a good leader and he wasn’t very smart. But I don’t necessarily believe that he deserves 15 years in the bing, unless, of course, we’re bringing every politician to justice (update: apparently AL Republican Gov. Guy Hunt was convicted for a corruption charge but only got 5 years probation). All I’m asking is that if you’re screaming “off with his head” about one crooked politician, make sure you’re doing it across the board. Otherwise you might be the pawn in someone’s political game with a hidden agenda.

What do you think?

admin Politics don siegelman, larry langford

As progressives, readers of freeThinkBirmingham are probably sympathetic to teachers' unions and may be suspicious of the charter school movement.

However, what recently happened to Alabama public education should rile all Alabama citizens, regardless of political affiliation.

Recently, a law was introduced that would legalize charter schools in Alabama.

Due to the stipulations of President Obama's "Race to the Top" education funding plan, legalizing charter schools helps a state qualify for part of the $180 million available to states.

This was truly a no-brainer, more choices, more funding, win-win.

Nearly everyone who cares about education in Alabama came out in favor of the law.

For it: Birmingham News, The Alabama Policy Institute, Gov. Bob Riley, Alabama Possible, Caroline Novack of the A+ Partnership, Former Congressman Jack Edwards in the Mobile Press-Register (Hat tip for the last two to the Left in Alabama blog).

There was really just one organization that didn't like the law: the almighty Alabama
Education Association.

So how did the AEA get its way over all these concerned citizens? They bought the Alabama House Education Appropriations Committee.

Montgomery Advisor:

Last week the House Education Appropriations Committee voted 13-2 to indefinitely postpone a bill that would allow state and local school systems to start charter schools. On Wednesday, the Senate Finance and Taxation-Education Committee voted 13-4 to kill a Senate version of the legislation. The two committee votes effectively kill any chance of charter schools being used soon in Alabama.

Turns out that for eight of the 13 committee members for which I could find information, the AEA was one of the top-five biggest campaign contributors. The AEA paid tens of thousands of dollars for those "no" votes.

Progressives talk so much about the importance of democracy. What happened to the Alabama charter school law is not democracy. It is a clear example of special interest groups buying votes and usurping the authority of and thwarting the efforts of the citizens.

Here you can find each of their names. To get each one's e-mail address and phone number, just click on the name. I haven't been able to find who voted yes and no, so you might just begin by asking how they voted. Or, if someone is able to find this info, please share it in the comments.

Whether it's the AEA or the NRA, special interests shouldn't be able to buy votes like this. Let's stand up to special interests and let our elected officials know that we're paying just as much attention to the issues as the special interest groups are, and we outnumber them.

—————————

Cathy Reisenwitz is a concerned Birmingham-area resident who blogs at http://anarcho-capitalism-blog.com/.

akbrim Politics AEA, legislation

These are, indeed, demoralizing times. The richest are getting richer. Everyone we know is getting laid off. Homelessness is skyrocketing; putting decent people out onto freezing streets. Nothing is happening with the wars, the poor, the education system, the food system, the political system. There’s absolutely no way progressives around the country can be feeling energized right now. Here in Birmingham, progressives have had even more shame to deal with as our local leaders steal from us and collude with big business and banks and do absolutely nothing to better our city.

What we need is a shot of encouragement. Even the smallest of achievements or victories could breathe new spirit into us and the movement for social change. We just need something to get us kick-started again like the months before the last Presidential election.

This small accomplishment for the progressives of Birmingham is to get Patrick Cooper elected as mayor.

The runoff election is only a few days away on Tuesday, January 19th. We need to be doing everything we can to get this man elected if we want to feel the empowerment of taking a step in the right direction. I encourage you to get in touch with your progressive friends and neighbors. Figure out what you can do to accomplish this goal. Print out a flyer to hang in your building or pass out in your neighborhood about why Cooper should be elected. Arrange a carpool to the polls. Text/Email all of your Birmingham friends a message about the January 19th election and tell them to forward it on. Even the slightest amount of effort could be rewarded handsomely if we manage to get such a forward-thinking, level-headed man into the Birmingham mayor’s office.

I know it’s hard to think about helping out an entire city when you are currently feeling so depressed and ineffective on a personal level. But the only way to fight this feeling is to give yourself some purpose and focus your energy on achieving even a small victory, if not for Birmingham, at least just for yourself. Electing Patrick Cooper as mayor is the way to regain some progressive momentum in a town that is dying both physically and spiritually. Will you answer this call, Birmingham? I hope you do!

admin Politics Birmingham, mayoral election, Patrick Cooper, Run-off election

ATTENTION DOWNTOWNERS

We have a rare opportunity to move the City of Birmingham in a new direction by voting PATRICK COOPER as Mayor on Tuesday, January 19, 2010.

Only 200 downtown residents voted in December!

We DRASTICALLY need to increase this number if we want POSITIVE and PROGRESSIVE CHANGE

WHAT CAN YOU DO?

VOTE and MAKE SURE YOUR FRIENDS VOTE on

TUESDAY, JANUARY 19, 2010

If you are not registered to vote, we can assist you! Contact Leigh at 585-7990 and we can deliver the voter registration form to you in person or by email and pick it up for processing. Or you can register in person at the Jefferson County Courthouse, 716 R Arrington Jr. Blvd N, Ste A-410.

To vote in this election you MUST REGISTER by January 8th, 2010.

If you will be busy or out of town on Election Day, you can cast an Absentee ballot at Birmingham City Hall, 710 North 20th Street – 3rd Floor during business hours anytime before January 14, 2010.

RENTERS – PLEASE REGISTER – WE NEED YOUR VOTE

TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE!

admin Politics

I had the opportunity to sit down and talk with mayoral hopeful Patrick Cooper Wednesday morning over some coffee. Urban Standard provided a relaxed environment for Cooper to take a break from his hectic schedule and discuss the previous election and the upcoming runoff. In light of the low voter turnout in the Downtown area for the Dec. 8th election, I hoped to find and flesh out some new material that could energize the downtown base; encouraging the informed but–apparently–uninspired citizenry from the area to actually show up for Cooper’s runoff against William Bell.

Read more…

admin Business, Entertainment, Politics Birmingham Entertainment District, Birmingham Mayoral Runoff, Patrick Cooper, Railroad Park

I had the regrettable experience of driving from Montevallo to Birmingham this morning in rush-hour traffic along I-65. Along the way, it became abundantly clear that Birmingham has made absolutely no sensible steps towards easing traffic congestion or the strain placed on the environment because of it.

As I drove past Pelham, I noticed they are widening the interstate. Genius. Let’s widen the road, so for a short amount of time people can feel like it’s alright to live 40 miles outside of Birmingham and still commute. This will cause more people to move out to the fringes of the city leading to urban sprawl, downtown abadonement, longer air-polluting commutes, and ultimately MORE TRAFFIC ON THE WIDENED ROAD. It’s an unsustainable feedback: widen the roads, more traffic, widen the roads again, etc.

Why not reallocate the money being used to build and maintain these roads to actual lessen the traffic that’s already there? Tax breaks could be given to employers who offer telecommuting or flex-hours. Tax incentives could be given to people to buy houses inside the downtown area. Better buses with park-and-rides could also help ease the traffic. The easiest and most glaring option, however, would simply be to make HOV lanes. It would cost peanuts to paint a strip on the road and put up a few signs but the benefits would be fantastic. This would encourage coworkers to start commuting together because they would get to their destination much faster which, in turn, would lessen the total number of cars on the road, making it a safer and more pleasant experience for everyone. We wouldn’t need all the fancy exit ramps from the HOV lane that other cities have, just one lane. How hard could this be? The fact that we don’t have this yet is a testament to the lack of judgement and thought involved in our city and county planning. I know there are people who care about Birmingham’s citizens and environment so I can only hope that one day we bond together and nudge–or shove–our leaders in smart and progressive directions.

admin General, Green, Politics environment, flextime, highways, HOV lane, telecommuting

Here’s a video of Robin Williams live in Birmingham poking fun at Alabama’s college football obsession and Mayor Larry Langford.

admin Entertainment, General, Politics larry langford